Value post

My main overriding political value can be found here

I love Southern Hospitality and Southern Charm and I believe that Southern Hospitality and Southern Charm are great traits to have. Southerners are friendly. We need to make Southern Hospitality and Southern go global

I love the kindness, warmth, and welcomeness by Southerners of visitors to their homes, and throughout the South in general. I love the friendliness, politeness. manners, thoughtfulness of Southern Hospitality. The smallest gestures of thoughtfulness and kindness can make someone's day. .

I love the foods of Southerners. I love Sweet Tea and Grits. Those are the heart of beautiful southern culture

I believe we should use media and communication to disrupt privilege, build trust, and strengthen movements for social justice (by my definition). I also study threats to these movements, and how to contain the spread of anti-Blackness, real white supremacy, and inequity. 

I emphasize personal autonomy and I reject alienating labor i.e. lack of ability to train in the work we'd like to do, not being paid adequately for the labor value we produce, workplace-centricity, etc.

I have equal scorn for people arguing for hopeless passivity as I do for political careerism, celebrity culture, self-righteousness, privileged vanguardism and martyrdom

I have equal scorn for people who insulate themselves in academia, scenes and cliques while also attempting to opportunistically manage struggles, as I do for people who advocate purity testing and insulating themselves in insurrectionary milieus.

I am against ostracism including political and social ostracism. Ostracism is just as bad as bullying and we need to have campaigns to oppose ostracism like we have campaigns to oppose bullying 

Economics is the field of study in relation to human action within the context of scarcity. 

I generally support Libertarian Unity

I try not to take away bad choices and make bad choices like sex work, porn, drugs illegal (which is what Liberal 2.0s sadly do) but everything has a limit and I have my limits with this outlook. This can be seen throughout my blog

I generally don't argue I should make rules for other people

I am part of a libertarian tradition is home to multiple persons and texts which model commitment both to individual liberty and to the consistent concern for the marginalized, both in the US and abroad. I hope we revive, energize, and extend that tradition—

This would be to demonstrate that us contemporary libertarians can, along with our traditional vindication of individual liberty, offer some effective, powerful, and innovative responses to the problems of economic vulnerability and injustice and to their social, political, and cultural consequences.

Some quotes that further reflect my socio-economic values can be found here

This is the foundations for my socioeconomic views and can be seen throughout my blog. 

I generally support voluntary exchange over forced wealth distribution 

Though I will settle for a mix of libertarianism, social progressivism, and markets.

Even though I am a Libertarian, I believe that addressing the needs of the economically vulnerable by remedying injustice, engaging in benevolence, doling out mutual aid, and encouraging the flourishing of bleeding heart free markets is both practically and morally important

I tend to reject state issued currency. I support an eventual moneyless , classless egalitarian society without hierarchies 

On different occasions over the last half decade, I have frequently oscillated between 

Me supporting variations of paleo libertarian ideology (libertarian as in European Libertarian). This is basically me supporting actually existing Delinquentistism . 

This includes me , when I enter this temporary recurring state to also sanitize Mises ideology within the LP by filtering the Mises caucus views through the leftist/progressive/liberalish views of these leftists/progressives/liberals to make said Mises views progressive and or leftist (like as Left wing as Contrapoints or at worst as liberal as Josh Gottheimer)  so I can support it each time I oscillate to this state of mind 

AND 

Me supporting Post colonial Anarchism left wing populism.

Bleeding Heart Libertarianism has a way better strategy than paleolibertarianism hence why I am a full time Bleeding Heart Libertarian and fair weather paleolibertarian

I believe Anarchy and the left need to evolve more to be more spiritual and humanistic 

I believe that Anarchists should be morally upright and relatively strong. I especially like retro Anarcho Libertarianism

I support peaceful, voluntary cooperation and the social life it brings.

I support moral values, including values like truth, righteousness and courage

I treat everyone equal (I support diversity) and I am tolerant, accepting, inclusive and open minded to different practices, attitudes, and cultures; which does not mean that I necessarily agree with the differences.

I support national values 

Some of my Anarcho Libertarian ideologies comes from similar ways of thought that Classical Liberalism comes from .But I feel that Classical Liberalism should reject the state and all those other meaningless social constructs

I support robust protections for just possessory claims

I feel that having a good or better personality should be a core political value for people in the political realm (even if they have a cult of personality) 

I am a fan of Survivalism and I believe that its a good concept to live by

There needs to be balance between rational thought (ie reason) and passion for people 

I support perspectivism

I believe people should overcome nihilism to live more fulfilling lives. If people don't go up when they pass away, they will have to overcome Nihilism on their own in the afterlife without religion to help them to do so.  

I did so back in college, where, after I was freaked out by learning of Eternal Return,  I then found out that Eternal Return is set forth by God in a creative way that isn't so nihilist or depressing. I realized back then that God sets forth Eternal Return in a way that when we realize what that way is, we as mentioned above overcome Nihilism and live more fulfilling lives. 

Frederick Nietzche's unique views of the world when combined with Liberal Marxism would be a unique political system that might work in some countries or areas

I support.Nietzche's idea of overcoming of Liberal mixed economy and Social fascism and the “modern world” by iconoclastic, Anarchist aristocratic concepts that are superhero like, as can be seen in the 4pt section here. The responsibility to build such a system and society falls on collective nurturing  

Max Stirner inspired Friedrich Nietzsche

Nietzsche wrote that the superman comes around as a countermovement to the mounting “economical use of men/women.” 

This countermovement expresses itself through a “secretion of luxurious surplus” that brings to light a stronger type of person

For Nietzsche, democratic society exists in a decaying state, or “passive nihilism” which is a bad equality that rejects transcendence, and leads to needing an accelerated higher way of living that is composed of the “strong and noble” Napoleon type of person who transforms passivity into activity.

This “active nihilism” is embodied by the superman that would reduce modern society to nothing and would build a new world on these ruins, overcoming base legalism with the action spirit.

But such a movement can’t occur without first enforcing another tyranny, they would admit

Even the anarchy and complete freedom principles become unfree, Nietzsche wrote, funding their absolute ends in nihilism as the consequence of politicalized economic thought of thinking

Napoleon is the embodiment of two types of nihilism, which is active nihilism and passive nihilism, the cure and the disease—. The superman arrives due to the lack of a higher plane in modern society, only to find in alienation a constant stream of the same crisis of modernity.

So from that we can seek syncretic, paternalistic and left auth movements that are part individualist, part collectivist; part left wing nationalist, part socialist . This stems from a mutual enmity against the system that is compromised of liberal democracy and a pentitulate decision to collaborate in its ultimate reimagining, transcendence or replacement.

This could include a quasi-spiritual “cult of myself,” , which would be a sentimental Anarchist with a rebel’s brain and a voluptuary’s nerves. An enemy of victimless laws that uses ancestor-nutrition,  faith in 

dead philosophers, religious people and poets

A movement that laments people who are uprooted by modern life, while hoping to create a new community that is based on traditional French type of acquaintanceships

Closer to AnCap anarchism than to Anarch Communism

A way to nurture a love of tradition that is giving way to “progress” that steams ahead with great vitality but toward a questionable destiny. There would be a temporary end of post statist representative monarchy, with a Christian occult ideal of aristocracy through to elevate people above the plebian drives of democracy.

I am a Pacifist

I support voluntary social cooperation

I have a right to question authority as do all Americans

I support the right to privacy and the right to be forgotten

I am against people having a sense of entitlement

I am laid back in my own unique way

I support social freedom

I would respect Liberal 2.0ers more if they gained life skills like learning how to fix trucks and growing their own food. Liberal 2.0ers who don't know how to do that stuff are bugmen

I am brave, articulate and smart and I believe that those are valuable traits

u/pa5tagod is a fascist

I glorify the entrepreneur

I am ok with Ego Communism 

I conditionally and generally support etiquette 

I am against subordination and I support using force against physical, economical and psychological threats (within reason). Once we get rid of subordination, all our issues as a society will be fixed

We don't have the right to subordinate other people to our ends or treat them as objects for our uses 

Marxism wants us to obey the laws of our countries and be obedient to the leaders of our countries as if the leaders of our countries were Karl Marx or Frederick Engels themselves (as long as those laws don’t conflict with Marxism) 

They would say “Give to each their own according to their ability and give to the state what is the state”

Marxism wants us citizens of the world to be shepherds to lost sheep (bourgeois, petty bourgeois, aristocrats and non Marxists) to help them be Marxists and usher in a socialistic revolution to help all people including thrm

I truly believe that people who are free from bourgeois vices are much happier and healthier than people who have bourgeois vices (especially while living in hierarchies and bondage to Capitalism)

I believe that people who live with bourgeois vices (especially while living in hierarchies and bondage to Capitalism) can only get true freedom once they lose their bourgeois vices (which can be easily accomplished once we abolish all hierarchies and Capitalism), hence why I have my views. 

All greedy unrepented bourgeois/petty bourgeois and aristocrats ,  (i.e those who are of the foul , jinxed spirit who are spiritually descended from that Capitalist Cain) will not enter the Marxist utopia we create 

Only bourgeois/petty bourgeois and aristocrats who become like Scrooge at the end of A Christmas Carol and become ungreedy and Marxist and or Left wing are redeemed and have become pure through the cleansing of the Marxist spirit and who are spiritually descended from what could have been Adam and Eve if they never sinned will enter the Marxist utopiaI believe the US should adopt Deism as its official religion

We need to learn about the nature of humanity, love, brotherhood, and relationships that we never understand. There is some truth and good in everything.

What is missing in society is what was missing in a lot of us: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. 

Some roaring time periods like the 1980s were about acquiring things like wealth, power, prestige. But we can acquire all we want and still feel empty. What power we wouldn't trade for a little more time with the ones we care about? The truth above is that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn so easily. Our leaders must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of Western society

Social authority in decentralized free associations, extended nuclear family and friend units, collectives, religious orgs, local communities, is a necessary concept to shield the citizen from the state and is necessary for maintaining a free and valuable society.

I mostly focus on daily life and the intersectionality thereof rather than dialectics / totalizing narratives

People are fake, fiction is real. Real life is faker than fiction

At heart I am not sure if the term “National Libertarian Impossibilist" is the label I would use for myself these days, but the sentiments remain. 

At heart I am mix of these ideologies fused together:

Left Libertarian American Conservativism (Sheldon Richman thought)-Left Wing Paleo Bull Moose Progressive , Libertarian Aristocracy, 

Anarcho Direct Democracy on steroids Anti State National Capitalism,  Contrarian

I am a supporter of the alternate history Hyperlane wing of the Prohibition Party and the Red Pillism 101ist  ---Centralism wing of the US Populist Party