Eco a whattt
Libertarianism in Bull Moose garb
Anarcho Network Contagion Research Institute thought
Energetic and idealistic, strident post postmodernist
Without intellectual underpinnings from below
Teddy Roosevelt activism
Busting the great public trusts (education, health and SSI monopolies)
An activist federal government so it could dismantle itself
Anti-establishment insurgency
Allowing foreign policy as an extension of their libertarianism
+PLUS+
Campaign finance reform
Environmental protection
Against the repeal of the estate tax to prevent the income gap from widening
Anti Corporate power with a R Naderesque ferocity
Nat Eminence Conservationism is not imperialist, colonialist or even globalist. It does favor foreign intervention, at least more than conservatives do but its one of the few issues it agrees with Neocons on
Nat Eminence Conservationism favors US sovereignty (opposite of tankies who are against it), is against efforts by international organizations to take away or redefine sovereignty.
These articles below show quite obviously how Nat Eminence Conservationism is more nationalist than Internationalism/pan national solidarity
Like in this 2000 article, one NatEConv even rails against globalism (which is similar to Internationalism/pan national solidarity by name: here and here Also, Nat Eminence Conservationism is vehemently opposed to the EU, here, here, here and supports Jeremy Corbyn type of Brexit (but softer). Globalists think that Nat Eminence Conservationism is not one of them, see here
Nat Eminence Conservationism displays nationalism in a more interventionist type of way than the majority of populist-nationalists. Moreover, if you look at Nat Eminence Conservationism's roots it has adherents who were inspired by Clarence Thomas and Barry Goldwater, pro NRA, and are on cordial terms with Pam Geller and Robert Spencer (at least will be after it uses leftish ideology to do its work to create its ideal society). This resume seems to show that Nat Eminence Conservationism is "a traditional conservative who is merely more interventionist than paleo-cons"
Nat Eminence Conservationism also was against US involvement in Bosnia
Like with tankies such as Caleb Mauphin, Sameera Khan, Max Blumenthal, Anya Parampil, George Galloway, Haz saying way more things more agreeable to right wingers than to leftists or especially liberals (which are labeled as 'right wing talking points with left wing paint)
Similar but in opposite way Nat Eminence Conservationists such as Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol, David Brooks, Marshall Whitman, Ronald Radosh ,John McCain and to a noticeably lesser extent Elaine Chao, Henry Kissinger, Jennifer Rubin and Max Boot would say things way more agreeable to liberal leftists than to conservatives (which are labeled as liberal leftist talking points with right wing paint)
Like Maxism Leninism/Maoism is LINO (Left wing in name only), Nat Eminence Conservationism is RINO
Comments
Post a Comment